CS代考 Software Design and Modelling

Software Design and Modelling
Exam Information
“Striving for success without hard work is like trying to harvest where you haven’t planted.”

Copyright By PowCoder代写 加微信 powcoder

Disclaimer
• Today’s lecture will summarise some key topics taught in this subject
• This slide may NOT cover all the important details related to the key topics
• You should NOT solely use this review for a review for your exam
To prepare for this exam, it is highly recommended to review:
– Lecture slides
– Workshop supplementary materials
– Workshop exercises
– Running case study (Tony’s Pizza)
– Textbook: Applying UML and Patterns (Larman 3rd Ed.); See Textbook Sections Covered
Whilst this exam is open book, you will not have enough time to complete the exam if you research all the questions during the exam time. We recommend you study for this exam like you would any other and aim for a good understanding of the key areas of focus, so you can craft the best answer you can during the exam time.

Subject Aims & Objective
• The aim of the subject is to teach you about ‘Software Modelling’ and ‘Software Design’.
• Software Design is all about purposefully choosing the behaviour and structure and of your software system.
– System behaviour: how your systems responds to inputs and events
– System structure: how parts of the system collaborate to achieve the goals of the system
• Software Modelling is the creation of tangible, but abstract, representations of a system so that you can communicate your design ideas, critique them and explore viable alternatives

An Overview
Unified Process:
an iterative & incremental software development process
development cycle phase
Inception Phase:
An iteration end- point when some significant decision
A stable executable subset of the final product. The end of each iteration is a minor release.
The difference (delta) between the releases of 2 subsequent iterations.
final production release
At this point, the
system is released
for production use.
– Analysis of ~10% of use cases
– Go or no Go decision
– Common Vision
– Use case model (Use case text
+ Use case diagram) or evaluation
transition

Use Case Model
Definition: Use Case is a list of actions or event step that define how the user (or some actors) interact with the system to achieve the goal
• Use case text is a written description (a story) of some actors using a system
• Use case diagram shows the relationships between actors and use cases in the system
Use Case: Pre-Operative Planning (brief)
The surgeon inspects and annotates an OWS x-ray; judgement is made regarding the femur neck resection lines and location of replacement components. Decisions are also made by the surgeon regarding type and size of replacement components, and the accessories needed for the operation. An operation plan is prepared to reflect decisions made during Pre-Operative Planning. Orders for the components and accessories are generated. A Fad may also be prepared and some details of the Pre-Operative Plan are added to Patient Details.
An Example of use case diagram

Example: Exam 2018 S1
Q81. Draw a use case diagram, covering the Pennand ATM description above.
1. The ATM allows an account holder to check the balance or make a withdrawal on one of their accounts.
2. When the ATM is idle, they can insert their transaction card and enter their PIN; the ATM will authenticate (via the banking network) the id from the card and their PIN.
….
12. When a customer first inserts their card, the ATM will photograph the customer and check the card details against a list of stolen cards (stored locally); a stolen card will be kept in the ATM and a message sent to the Police Card Agency, before the ATM returns to the idle state.
13. If the ATM at any stage detects a fault, it switches itself into out-of-service mode; a maintenance technician can then use this mode to conduct diagnosis/repairs, before shutting down and restarting the ATM.

Example: Exam 2018 S1
<>
Check balance
<>
Cash Withdrawal
Answers for Exam 2018 S1 is available in Sample Exam page under the LMS exam module
Use the Boss Test, EBP, or Size test to justify the level to express use case
Include relationship can be added. (see workshop 1 sup materials)

An Overview
development cycle phase
Unified Process:
an iterative & incremental software development process
Inception Phase:
Elaboration Phase:
final production
At this point, the system is released
milestone release
– Analysis of ~10% of use cases – Building the core architecture, analyse the high-risk elements
– Go or No Go decision
– Common Vision
– Discover and stabilise most of the requirements
An iteration end- A stable executable
The difference
(delta) between the
– Start to think about the design
point when some subset of the final
significant decision product. The end of
or evaluation each iteration is a
+ Use case diagram) technical memo) iterations.
– Use case model (Use case text – Software Architecture Doc (e.g., component diagram, factor table,
occurs. minor release.
– Domain and Design models for some requirements
releases of 2
transition
subsequent for production use.

Architectural Analysis
Definition: An activity to identify factors that will influence the architecture, to understand their variability and priority, and resolve them
Architectural Analysis includes identifying and analysing:
– Architecturally significant requirement: The requirement that can have a large impact on the design (especially when it was not considered at the beginning)
– Variation points
– Potential evolution points
Goal: To reduce risk of missing a critical factor in the design of a system

Architecturally Significant Requirements
Functional Examples Description
Auditing Provide audit trails of system execution.
Localization Provide facilities for supporting multiple human languages.
Printing Provide facilities for printing.
Workflow Provide support for moving documents and other work items, including review and approval cycles.
Non-Functional Description Examples
Usability Incl. UX, aesthetics, and consistency in the UI.
Reliability Incl. availability, accuracy of calculations, failure recovery.
Performance Incl. throughput, response time, recovery time, start-up time.
Supportability Incl. testability, adaptability, maintainability.

Case Study: Chauffeured Car Company
Client’s Requirement:
Want the system to be more
responsive
Current Issues: Responsiveness
• Remote Desktop over internet
to remote server
• Sharing of limited bandwidth:
UI freezes
Current architecture of the system

Case Study: Chauffeured Car Company
Client’s Requirement:
Want the system to be more
responsive
Resolution:
Responsiveness
• Change from remote desktop +
remote server to local system
deployment Stage 1 Deployment
Bookings and Dispatch
+ B&D System V3 + B&D System V5
Developer A’s :Server
«executionEnvironment»
B&D :Virtual Machine
B&D DB : SQLServer
«executionEnvironment»
:Login Session
:B&D System V5
«executionEnvironment»
:Login Session
:B&D System V5
Architecture is significantly changed to address the issues
Revised architecture of the system (Stage 1)

Example: Architecture Factor Table
Reliability—Recoverability of POS
Measures and quality scenarios
Variability (current flexibility and future evolution)
Impact of factor (and its variability) on stakeholders, architecture and other factors
Priority for Success
Difficulty or Risk
Recovery from remote service (e.g., Tax Calculator) failure
When remote service fails, re-establish connectivity with it within 1 min. of its detected re-availability, under normal store load in a production environment.
current flexibility – our SME says local client-side simplified services are acceptable (and desirable) until reconnection is possible.
evolution – within 2 years, some retailers may be willing to pay for full local replication of remote services (such as the tax calculator). Probability? High.
High impact on large-scale design. Retailers really dislike it when remote services fail, as it prevents them from using a POS to make sales.

Example: Technical memo
Technical Memo: Issue: Reliability—Recovery from Remote Service Failure Factors
Robust recovery from remote service failure, e.g., tax calculator, inventory Solution
To satisfy the quality scenarios of reconnection with the remote services ASAP, use smart Proxy objects for the services, that on each service call test for remote service reactivation, and redirect to them when possible.
Where possible, offer local implementations of remote services. For example, implementing a small cache to store data (e.g., tax rates)
Achieve protected variation with respect to location of services using an Adapter created in a ServicesFactory.

Example: Technical memo (cont)
Motivation
Retailers really don’t want to stop making sales! Therefore, if the
NextGen POS offers this level of reliability and recovery, it will be a very attractive product, as none of our competitors provide this capability.
The small product cache is motivated by very limited client-side resources. The real third-party tax calculator is not replicated on the client primarily because of the higher licensing costs, and configuration efforts (as each calculator installation requires almost weekly adjustments).
This design (Adapter and ServiceFactory) also supports the evolution point of future customers willing and able to permanently replicate services such as the tax calculator to each client terminal.
Unresolved Issues
Alternatives Considered
A “gold level” quality of service agreement with remote credit authorization services to improve reliability. It was available, but much too expensive.

Domain Model
Domain models capture the concepts, attributes, and associations in the domain
• Domain class diagram provides a static context of system: A visual dictionary of noteworthy abstractions,
domain vocabulary, and information content of the domain
• System Sequence Diagrams provides dynamic context of system: How actors interact with system (as a black box) and how the system respond
• Domain models & SSDs should be expressed at the abstract level of intention
– Provide essential abstractions in information required to understand the domain in the context of the
current requirements
– Aid people in understanding the domain

Design Model
Design Model is a tangible representation of software classes to illustrate the structure, collaboration, and responsibilities of software objects
• Design class diagram provides a static view of the class names, attributes, and method signatures
• Design sequence diagram provides a dynamic view of how software objects interact via messages
• State Machine Diagram is a behaviour model that captures the dynamic behaviour of an object (or a system) in terms of states, events, and state transitions
To create Design model:
• Use the domain models to inspire the design of software objects
– To reduce representational gap between how stakeholders conceive the domain and its
representation in software
• Use a responsibility-driven design: GRASP and GoF design patterrns

GRASP concerns on assigning responsibility to a software object: Generic Problem: “Who should be responsible for Task X?”
Pattern/Principle
Brief Solution
If an object A contains or often use an object B, an object A should be responsible for creating an object B (Task X = Creation of B)
Information Expert If an object A has a relevant information for Task X, an object A should be responsible for Task X
Low Coupling
Assign the responsibility for Task X to an object to make the coupling of the system remains low
High Cohesion Assign the responsibility for Task X to an object that has strongly related responsibilities (the cohesion of the system remains high)
Pure Fabrication
If the solutions offered by other patterns (e.g., Creator, Expert) violate Low Coupling and High Cohesion, assign the responsibility for Task X to an artificial class that was represented in the domain model

GRASP concerns on assigning responsibility to a software object: “Who should be responsible for Task X?”
Pattern/Principle
Brief Solution
Indirection
To avoid direct coupling, an intermediate object to mediate between other components or services should be responsible for Task X.
Controller
What first object beyond the UI layer receives and coordinates (“controls”) a system operation? -> Assign responsibility to a class representing one of: (a) a “root” object; or (b) a use case scenario that deals with the event.
• Motivated by Indirection, Controller helps to avoid direct coupling between app logic and UI levels
• Controller can be an artificial class motivated by Pure Fabrication
Protected Variation
If there are variations or instability in these elements, assign responsibilities to create a stable interface
Polymorphism If the behaviour of Task X is varied based on type or domain classes have various forms, assign responsibility for the behavior—using polymorphic operations—to
the types for which the behavior varies

GoF Design Patterns
GoF Design Patterns: A set of patterns for specific problems
Pattern Brief Description
Q: How to provide a stable interface to similar components with different interfaces? A: Convert the original interface of a component into another interface, through an intermediate adapter object.
Q: Who should be responsible fore creating objects when there are special consideration? A: Create a Pure Fabrication object called a Factory that handles the creation
: If there is an object A that many other objects need to access, who should be responsible for creating/containing an object A?
A: Define a static method of the class A that returns the singleton object A.
Strategy Q: How to design for varying, but related, algorithms, strategies or policies?
A: Define each algorithm/policy/strategy in a separate class, with a common interface.
Composite Q: How to treat a group or composition structure of objects the same way (polymorphically) as a non- composite (atomic) object?
A: Define classes for composite and atomic objects so that they implement the same interface.

GoF Design Patterns
GoF Design Patterns: A set of patterns for specific problems
Pattern Brief Description
Q: How to design for a common, unified interface to a disparate set of implementations or interfaces—such as within a subsystem—is required.
A: Create a Pure Fabrication object called a Façade object to define a single point of contact to the subsystem
Q: How to dynamically add behaviour to individual objects at run-time without changing the interface presented to the client?
A: Encapsulating the original concrete object inside an abstract wrapper interface. Then, let the decorators that contain the dynamic behaviours also inherit from this abstract interface.
Q: Different kinds of subscriber objects are interested in the state changes or events of a publisher object, and want to react in their own unique way when the publisher generates an event.
A: Define a “subscriber” or “listener” interface. Subscribers implement this interface. The publisher can dynamically register subscribers who are interested in an event and notify them when an event occurs.

Exam Information

Exam Information/Instructions
There is an exam module on the LMS with a sample exam and past exams. The exam details will be available under Assignments on the LMS.
Exam Consultation: We will schedule some Zoom consultation sessions during leading up to the exam.☺ Keep an eye out for an announcement and on the LMS Zoom page. We will continue to answer questions on the LMS Ed discussion forum.
Important Note:
• Exam via Canvas Quiz (Practice Exam will soon be available)
• Some questions will require you to draw a diagram
– All diagrams must be legibly hand-drawn. Include your student number on the top right of all diagrams.
– Before the exam, prepare paper + pencil + a facility to take a photo or scan your hand-drawn diagram *You can use a tablet to draw a diagram, but it must be legibly hand-drawn and all text in diagrams must be hand-written.

Exam Principles
• Is there reading or writing code in Exam?
– Short Answer: Reading code -> Possibly, yes; Writing code -> Possibly, but snippets only
– Long Answer: Coding is not the core focus of this subject, but coding can demonstrate the effectiveness of design. You should be able to recognize/produce code structures relating to design patterns/principles.
• What kind of questions/topics will be in the exam?
– Short Answer: All the key topics mentioned today can be in the exam
– Long Answer: Based on the learning objective of this subject, you should be able to “Apply the knowledge of modelling and design to solve computing problems” and “Evaluate and apply appropriate choices of software tools in the modelling and design process”. These are the key focus of the exam. And you should demonstrate these in your exam answers.

Q&A about the exam
Q: Why can’t we use draw.io or a similar tool for an exam answers?
A: No. The University is very serious about academic misconduct. We need to ensure that all the answers are genuinely yours. So, we need your hand-writing and hand-drawing to prove that.
Q: If we run into any issue with uploading a photo, can we get partial mark by describing our solutions in words?
A: There will be a period of 30-min factored into the exam for you to ensure that all the photos are uploaded. But if you still encounter technical issues, please check out special consideration.
Q: Is there any recommendations for uploading the photos?
A: Keep the photos reasonably small (<1MB). The size they show after upload is not indicative of the upload size. To ensure that everything will work during the exam, please try to do Practice Exam and upload diagrams as a test. Q&A about exam Q: Are we able to start writing during reading time? A: There is no separation of reading time, so yes, it’s okay.☺ Q: Are the workshop supplementary materials relevant to the exam? A: Yes. However, the topics that will be in the exam will mainly be in the lecture slides and workshop exercises. Q: DD and refactoring be in the exam? A: Possibly because TDD and refactoring are part of workshop supp materials. Q: Do we need to know the specific tools to use, e.g. Amazon web service? A: No. That’s not the key focus of this subject Q: Would there be a detailed case study like week 11 in the exam? A: There could be a case study in the exam, but not as big as the week 11 or project assignments. The size and complexity would be reasonable given the fixed timeframe (2 hours of exam). Q&A (Others) Q: How detailed should our design sequence diagram be? A: It should reflect how the code works. If your diagram is too large, you can use ref frame to break the diagram into parts. Q: What kind of classes should and shouldn’t be in the domain model? A: The domain model capture the understanding about the domain and requirements. The classes should be meaningful to the stakeholder, relevant to the problem being solved, and not relate to an implementation to be in the domain model. Q: A class made for pure fabrication wouldn’t be included in the domain model, right? A: Correct. Q: Should architecture always go first, before the domain and software design? 程序代写 CS代考 加微信: powcoder QQ: 1823890830 Email: powcoder@163.com