EXAM FEEDBACK 2017-2018
HUMAN CENTRED SECURITY (M)
QUESTION 1
There was a mixed performance for the first question. Candidates were generally able to outline
guidelines and provide a solution to properly communicate risk. In terms of improvement,
some candidates often did not provide sufficient clarity and detail when describing guidelines
and communicating risk.
QUESTION 2
There was generally good performance for the second question. Candidates were generally able
to consider and critique the approach to addressing insider threats. In terms of improvement,
some candidates often did not provide sufficient detail when critiquing the policy and some
arguments were not coherent.
QUESTION 3
There was a mixed performance for the third question. Candidates were generally able to
present arguments on social engineering and how they could form the basis of advanced
persistent threats. In terms of improvement, some candidates often did not provide sufficient
detail to have confidence in their comprehension of advanced persistent threats.