Vision and Challenges
for Realising the
Internet of Things
March 2010
Edited by Harald Sundmaeker Patrick Guillemin Peter Friess Sylvie Woelfflé
The meaning of things lies not in the things themselves, but in our attitude towards them.
Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
Book Editors
Harald Sundmaeker, CuteLoop Coordinator ATB, Bremen, Germany Sundmaeker@atb-bremen.de
Patrick Guillemin, CERP-IoT Coordinator, ETSI, Sophia-Antipolis, France Patrick.Guillemin@etsi.org
Peter Friess, CERP-IoT EC Coordinator, European Commission, Brussels Belgium Peter.Friess@ec.europa.eu
Sylvie Woelfflé
European Commission, Brussels Belgium Sylvie.Woelffle@ec.europa.eu
Foreword
Gérald Santucci, Head of Unit
DG INFSO Unit D.4; European Commission
SRA Core Authors and Editor Team:
Ovidiu Vermesan, NO, SINTEF, EPoSS
Mark Harrison, UK,
University of Cambridge, Auto-ID Lab, BRIDGE, EPCglobal Data Discovery JRG
Harald Vogt, DE, SAP, SToP
Kostas Kalaboukas, GR, SingularLogic, EURIDICE
Maurizio Tomasella, UK,
University of Cambridge, Auto-ID Lab, SMART, BRIDGE
Karel Wouters, BE, K.U.Leuven, PrimeLife
Sergio Gusmeroli, IT,
TXT e-Solutions SpA, iSURF, COIN
Stephan Haller, CH, SAP, CoBIS
For further information:
IoT Related Articles
Several teams stemming from IoT related research projects and initiatives were sum- marising their perspectives and experiences. The authors and their affiliation are listed within the separate sections of Chapter 4.
The editors would also like to thank the re- view team for their support and contribu- tions.
Project Profiles
As popular as IoT became recently, as wide are the research fields distributed. The mem- bers of the Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things (CERP- IoT) are outlining their objectives and re- search work. The individual project partners and contact points are mentioned as refer- ence for future collaboration.
Information Desk
European Commission – Information Society and Media DG Office: BU25 02/59 B-1049 Brussels
Email: infso-desk@ec.europa.eu http://europa.eu/information_society
Editors and Contributors
••• 2
CERP-IoT – Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things
Foreword
Vision and Challenges for Realising the Internet of Things
It goes without saying that we are very content to publish this Clusterbook and to leave it today to your hands. The Cluster of European Research projects on the Internet of Things – CERP-IoT – comprises around 30 major research initiatives, platforms and networks work- ing in the field of identification technologies such as Radio Frequency Identification and in what could become tomorrow an Internet-connected and inter-connected world of objects. The book in front of you reports to you about the research and innovation issues at stake and demonstrates approaches and examples of possible solutions.
If you take a closer look you will realise that the Cluster reflects exactly the ongoing develop- ments towards a future Internet of Things – growing use of Identification technologies, mas- sive deployment of simple and smart devices, increasing connection between objects and systems. Of course, many developments are less directly derived from the core research area but contribute significantly in creating the “big picture” and the paradigm change.
We are also conscious to maintain Europe’s strong position in these fields and the result be- ing achieved, but at the same time to understand the challenges ahead as a global endeavour with our international partners. As it regards international co-operation, the cluster is com- mitted to increasing the number of common activities with the existing international partners and to looking for various stakeholders in other countries.
However, we are just at the beginning and, following the prognostics which predict 50 to 100 billion devices to be connected by 2020, the true research work starts now. The European Commission is decided to implement its Internet of Things policy for supporting an economic revival and providing better life to its citizens, and it has just selected from the last call for proposals several new Internet of Things research projects as part of the 7th Framework Pro- gramme on European Research.
We wish you now a pleasant and enjoyable reading and would ask you to stay connected with us for the future. Special thanks are expressed to Harald Sundmaeker and his team who did a remarkable effort in assembling this Clusterbook.
Brussels, March 2010
Peter Friess Gérald Santuci
3
CERP-IoT – Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things
Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union
Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11
(*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed.
More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication.
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010
ISBN 978-92-79-15088-3
doi:10.2759/26127
© European Union, 2010
Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
Printed in Belgium
PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER
Table of contents
Foreword Vision and Challenges for Realising the Internet of Things …………… 3 Chapter 1 The Internet of Things …………………………………………………………. 9
1.1
1 2 3 4
1.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Chapter 2 Chapter3
The Internet of Things: Between the Revolution of the Internet and the Metamorphosis of Objects …………………………………………………………………………11 Origin of the concept of “Internet of Things”……………………………………………………….12 Development of the Internet of Things ………………………………………………………………. 13 IoT research and technological development in Europe …………………………………………21 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 23
A Poor or a Rich Internet of Things; our choice now ……………………………………25
A global revolution ………………………………………………………………………………………… 25 A mental revolution ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 25 A political revolution ……………………………………………………………………………………… 26 A bartering revolution……………………………………………………………………………………..26 An educational revolution ……………………………………………………………………………….. 27 A technological revolution ………………………………………………………………………………. 27 A spiritual revolution ……………………………………………………………………………………… 27
The CERP-IoT Cluster ………………………………………………………… 29
Strategic ResearchAgenda…………………………………………………39
Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………….41
3.1 Internet of Things Vision …………………………………………………………………………..43
3.1.1 Internet of Things Common Definition……………………………………………………………….43
3.1.2 Internet of Things Vision ………………………………………………………………………………… 43
3.2 Internet of Things Application Domains …………………………………………………….49
3.2.1 Aerospace and aviation (systems status monitoring, green operations) …………………….. 50
3.2.2 Automotive (systems status monitoring, V2V and V2I communication)……………………50
3.2.3 Telecommunications………………………………………………………………………………………. 51
3.2.4 Intelligent Buildings (automatic energy metering/ home automation/ wireless
monitoring) …………………………………………………………………………………………………..51
3.2.5 Medical Technology, Healthcare, (personal area networks, monitoring of
parameters, positioning, real time location systems) ……………………………………………..52
3.2.6 Independent Living (wellness, mobility, monitoring of an aging population)……………..52
3.2.7 Pharmaceutical ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 53
3.2.8 Retail, Logistics, Supply Chain Management ……………………………………………………… 53
3.2.9 Manufacturing, Product Lifecycle Management (from cradle to grave) ……………………. 53
3.2.10 Processing industries – Oil and Gas …………………………………………………………………… 53
3.2.11 Safety, Security and Privacy ……………………………………………………………………………. 54
3.2.12 Environment Monitoring…………………………………………………………………………………. 54
3.2.13 People and Goods Transportation……………………………………………………………………… 54
3.2.14 Food traceability…………………………………………………………………………………………….55
3.2.15 Agriculture and Breeding………………………………………………………………………………… 55
3.2.16 Media, entertainment and Ticketing ………………………………………………………………….. 55
3.2.17 Insurance………………………………………………………………………………………………………55
3.2.18 Recycling …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 56
3.3 Technologies supporting the Internet of Things vision …………………………………57
3.3.1 Identification Technology ……………………………………………………………………………….. 57
3.3.2 Internet of Things Architecture Technology ……………………………………………………….. 59
3.3.3 Communication Technology ……………………………………………………………………………. 60
3.3.4 Network Technology ……………………………………………………………………………………… 61
3.3.5 Network Discovery ………………………………………………………………………………………… 61
3.3.6 Software and algorithms …………………………………………………………………………………. 62
3.3.7 Hardware……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 62
3.3.8 Data and Signal Processing Technology …………………………………………………………….. 63
3.3.9 Discovery and Search Engine Technologies ……………………………………………………….. 64
5
CERP-IoT – Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things
3.3.10 Relationship Network Management Technologies ……………………………………………….. 65
3.3.11 Power and Energy Storage Technologies……………………………………………………………. 65
3.3.12 Security and Privacy Technologies…………………………………………………………………….66
3.3.13 Standardisation ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 67
3.4 Internet of Things Research Agenda, Timelines and Priorities ………………………69
3.4.1 Identification Technology ……………………………………………………………………………….. 69
3.4.2 Internet of Things Architecture Technology ……………………………………………………….. 69
3.4.3 Communication Technology ……………………………………………………………………………. 70
3.4.4 Network Technology ……………………………………………………………………………………… 70
3.4.5 Software, Services and Algorithms……………………………………………………………………. 71
3.4.6 Hardware……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 71
3.4.7 Data and Signal Processing Technology …………………………………………………………….. 72
3.4.8 Discovery and Search Engine Technologies ……………………………………………………….. 72
3.4.9 Relationship Network Management Technologies ……………………………………………….. 73
3.4.10 Power and Energy Storage Technologies……………………………………………………………. 73
3.4.11 Security and Privacy Technologies…………………………………………………………………….73
3.4.12 Standardisation ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 74
3.4.13 Future Technological Developments …………………………………………………………………. 75
3.4.14 Internet of Things Research Needs ……………………………………………………………………. 77
3.5 References………………………………………………………………………………………………..81
Chapter 4 Articles……………………………………………………………………………. 83
4.1 Anti-Counterfeiting and how to deal with it in an IoT ………………………………….. 85
1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………..85
2 Markets for Counterfeit Products ……………………………………………………………………… 86
3 Automatic Identification and Authentication ………………………………………………………. 87
4 Business Process Integration ……………………………………………………………………………. 90
5 Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 90
4.2 Challenges for Usage of Networked Devices Enabled Intelligence………………….93
1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………..93
2 Analysed Business Environments……………………………………………………………………… 94
3 Networked Devices Enabled Intelligence …………………………………………………………… 96
4 The CuteLoop Framework ………………………………………………………………………………. 99
5 Conclusions………………………………………………………………………………………………… 102
6 Acknowledgement ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 102
7 References………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 103
4.3 NFC Technology and its Application Scenarios in a Future IoT ………………….. 105
1 IoT and NFC ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 105
2 NFC technology ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 106
3 Services and use-cases ………………………………………………………………………………….. 107
4 StoLPaN project results ………………………………………………………………………………… 108
5 Conclusion and Future Work …………………………………………………………………………. 109
6 Acknowledgment…………………………………………………………………………………………. 110
7 References………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 110
4.4 RFID-enabled Tracking and Tracing in the Supply Chain Lessons Learnt fromthe SMARTandTRASERprojects………………………………………………….111
1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………… 111
2 Lessons Learnt from the SMART project …………………………………………………………. 112
3 Lessons learnt from the TraSer project …………………………………………………………….. 117
4 Discussion and Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………… 122
5 References………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 123
6 Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………………………… 124
4.5 An EU FP7 Project defining and accommodating international issues
concerning RFID with particular reference to the emerging “Internet of
Things.” …………………………………………………………………………………………………125
1 The CASAGRAS Initiative…………………………………………………………………………….125
2 CASAGRAS Conclusions……………………………………………………………………………… 126
3 Recommendations ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 128
4.6 Standardisation issues challenges on RFID and a future IoT ………………………. 129
6
CERP-IoT – Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things
1 2 3 4 5
4.7
1
2 3 4
4.8
1 2 3 4 5 6
4.9
1 2 3 4 5
4.10
1 2 3 4
4.11
1 2 3 4 5
Chapter 5
Organization……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 129 GRIFS – Architecture and Standardisation ……………………………………………………….. 130 GRIFS conclusions ………………………………………………………………………………………. 131 GRIFS standard database ………………………………………………………………………………. 132 GRIFS MOU and GRIFS Forum …………………………………………………………………….. 136
Developing and Piloting the Next Generation of Networked RFID Systems ….. 137
Building Radio Frequency Identification Solutions for the Global Environment (BRIDGE) ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 137 BRIDGE work strands: achievements and outlook …………………………………………….. 139 Enhancing European operations with RFID and fine-grained information sharing ……. 151 Conclusions………………………………………………………………………………………………… 152
Open Source Middleware for Networked Embedded Systems towards
Future Internet of Things………………………………………………………………………… 153 Internet of Things ………………………………………………………………………………………… 153 ASPIRE …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 154 Hydra ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 158 Summary and Future Steps ……………………………………………………………………………. 162 Acknowledgment…………………………………………………………………………………………. 162 References………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 162
Usage of RFID in the Forest & Wood Industry and Contribution to Environmental Protection………………………………………………………………………..165 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………… 165 Traceability in the forest and wood industry ……………………………………………………… 166 Monitoring environmental performance …………………………………………………………… 170 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 173 References………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 173
RACE networkRFID – Stimulating the take-up of RFID in Europe …………….. 175
Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………… 175 The Vision………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 177 Impact ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 179 Members ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 180
OutlookonFutureIoTApplications………………………………………………………….181
Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………… 181 Technology ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 185 Applications ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 186 Research Priorities……………………………………………………………………………………….. 188 Future outlook …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 189
Projects in the Cluster……………………………………………………….. 191
AmI-4-SME …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 193 ASPIRE …………………………………………………………………………………………………………194 BRIDGE ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 195 CASAGRAS ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 196 CASCADAS…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 197 CE RFID………………………………………………………………………………………………………..198 CoBIs ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 199 CONFIDENCE ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 200 CuteLoop ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 201 DACAR…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 202 DiYSE …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 203 DYNAMITE ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 205 EPoSS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 206
7
CERP-IoT – Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things
EURIDICE ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 208 GRIFS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 210 Hydra ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 211 IFM Project …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 212 Indisputable Key …………………………………………………………………………………………….214 IMS 2020………………………………………………………………………………………………………..215 iSURF ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………216 LEAPFROG ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 217 PEARS Feasibility ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 219 PrimeLife ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 220 RACE networkRFID……………………………………………………………………………………….221 SMART …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 223 SMMART ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 224 StoLPaN………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 225 SToP………………………………………………………………………………………………………………226 TraSer …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 227 WALTER ………………………………………………………………………………………………………228
8
CERP-IoT – Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things
Chapter 1 The Internet of Things
1.1 The Internet of Things: Between the Revolution of the Internet and the Metamorphosis of Objects
Gérald Santucci
Head of Unit “Enterprise Networking and RFID”
European Commission Directorate General Information Society and Media
“The Internet of Things has the potential to change the world, just as the Internet did. Maybe even more so.”
Kevin Ashton, 2009
“And men got dreaming. Shouldn’t there be a network that made all my devices collaborate at all times, converse spontaneously among themselves and with the rest of the world, and all together make up a kind of single virtual computer – the sum of their respective intelligence, knowledge and know how?”
Rafi Haladjian, 2005
“Society is now created for technological, rather than for human, requirements. And that’s where tragedy begins.”
C. Virgil Gheorghiu, The Twenty-Fifth Hour, 1950
“Because of the crisis, doomsday is postponed”
La Gueule Ouverte, May 1968
After the World Wide Web (the 1990’s) and the mobile Internet (the 2000’s), we are now heading to the third and potentially most “disruptive”1 phase of the Internet revolution – the “Internet of Things”. The Internet of Things links the objects of the real world with the virtual world, thus enabling anytime, anyplace connectivity for anything and not only for anyone. It refers to a world where physical objects and beings, as well as virtual data and environments, all interact with each other in the same space and time.
1 The term “disruptive technology” was coined by Clayton M. Christensen and introduced in his 1995 article Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave, which he co-wrote with Joseph L. Bower. Ref. Harvard Business Review, January-February 1995.
11
CERP-IoT – Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things
1 Origin of the concept of “Internet of Things” 1.1 MIT Auto-ID Center
The phrase “Internet of Things” was coined some 10 years ago by the founders of the original MIT Auto-ID Center, with special mention to Kevin Ashton in 19992 and David L. Brock in 20013. The term “Auto-ID” refers to any broad class of identification technologies used in in- dustry to automate, reduce errors, and increase efficiency. These technologies include bar codes, smart cards, sensors, voice recognition, and biometrics. But since 2003 the Auto-ID technology on the main stage has been Radio Frequency Identification (RFID).
The climax of the Auto-ID Center reputation occurred in September 2003, when the EPC (Electronic Product Code) Executive Symposium taking place in Chicago (Illinois, USA) marked the official launch of the EPC Network – an open technology infrastructure allowing computers to automatically identify man-made objects and track them as they flow from the plant to distribution centre to store shelves. The Symposium, supported then by more than 90 major companies from around the world – representing food, consumer goods, retail, trans- portation and pharmaceuticals industries, among others – highlighted RFID deemed to be- come a key enabling technology for economic growth in the next fifty years. Considering the Symposium in historic terms, Kevin Ashton foretold a shift from computer information proc- essing to computer sensing.
A few weeks after the Symposium, in October 2003, the MIT Auto-ID Center was re- christened as Cambridge Auto-ID Lab when it was closed and split into a research arm – the Auto-ID Labs – and a commercial arm – EPCglobal, a joint venture between UCC and EAN.
The goal of the Auto-ID Labs is to develop a network connecting computers to objects – not just the hardware (RFID tags and readers) or the software to run the network, but actually everything that is needed to create an Internet of Things, including affordable hardware, net- work software and protocols, and languages for describing objects in ways computers can un- derstand. It is important to note that the Auto-ID Labs is not seeking to create another global network but rather to develop the elements built on top of the Internet4 that would enable tracking items and sharing information over the Internet.
1.2 When Internet of Things leaves the lab to come in broad daylight
Among the first papers of general interest on the Internet of Things, those mentioned below marked the beginning of a new era for commerce and industry. The Internet of Things is con- sidered then as the mere extension of Radio Frequency Identification where “RFID is kind of the amoeba of the wireless computing world” (Kevin Ashton). But the phrase “Internet of Things” points out a vision of the machines of the future: in the nineteenth century, machines learned to do; in the twentieth century, they learned to think; and in the twenty-first century, they are learning to perceive – they actually sense and respond.
“The Internet of Things”, by Sean Dodson, The Guardian, 9 October 2003.5
“Toward a Global Internet of Things”, by Steve Meloan, Sun Microsystems, 11 November 2003.6 It heralded that “With the official release of the Electronic Product Code Network, we are about to see the Internet of Things paradigm enter the big time – the world of main- stream commerce”. Sun Microsystems argued of course that with its notion that “The Net- work is the Computer”, it was uniquely positioned to play a leading role in the Auto-ID revolution, especially with respect to security, scalability and cross-platform compatibility.
“A Machine-to-Machine Internet of Things”, Business Week, 26 April 2004.
2 “I could be wrong, but I’m fairly sure the phrase ‘Internet of Things’ started life as the title of a presentation I made at Procter & Gamble (P&G) in 1999”, Kevin Ashton, RFID Journal, 22 June 2009.
3 David L. Brock, MIT Auto-ID Center, MIT-AUTOID-WH-002, “The Electronic Product Code”, January 2001.
4 More specifically the Electronic Product Code (which gives each item a unique number), the Object Name Service (which points a computer to an address on the Internet where information about a product is stored), the XML-based Physical Markup Language (which enables computers to gather information and act on it), and the software technology called Savant (which allows to manage and move information in a way that doesn’t
overload existing corporate and public networks).
5 http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2003/oct/09/shopping.newmedia
6 http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Ecommerce/rfid/. This article heralded that “With the official
release of the Electronic Product Code Network, we are about to see the Internet of Things paradigm enter the big time – the world of mainstream commerce”. Sun Microsystems argued that with its notion that “The Net- work is the Computer”, it was uniquely positioned to play a leading role in the Auto-ID revolution, especially with respect to security, scalability and cross-platform compatibility.
12
CERP-IoT – Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things