程序代写代做代考 Microsoft Word – BISM7255_Final_Assignment-2018.docx

Microsoft Word – BISM7255_Final_Assignment-2018.docx

BISM7255 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYSIS & DESIGN — SEMESTER 1-2018

6
[Version: February 25, 2018]

Marking Rubric
Student Name: __________________/ Student ID: __________________ Marks Achieved ___ / from total 40 marks

Comments:

Section Poor Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

Use Case
Diagrams

(x 1.5) – 6
points

• Simple use
case diagram
included

• Incorrect
notation is
used

(zero mark)

• Two use case diagrams
are included but they
do not include any
details, and are
inconsistent with the
identified problem,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

• Notation used for use
case diagrams has
many errors

• Very few of the major
actors are included in
the use case diagram

For each use case diagram:
• Less than 3 actors and

less than 10 top level
use cases

(two marks)

• Two use case diagrams
are included are of
sufficient detail,
consistent with the
identified problem,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

• Notation used for use
case diagrams has some
errors

• Some of the major
actors are included in
the use case diagram

For each use case diagram:
• Less than 3 actors and

less than 10 top level
use cases

• One extend relationship
• One include relationship

(four marks)

• Two use case diagrams are
included, are of sufficient
detail, consistent with the
identified problems,
requirements, and the
proposed solution.

• Notation used for use case
diagrams has few errors

• Most of the major actors are
included in the use case
diagram

For each use case diagram:
• 3 actors but less than 10 top

level use cases
• Two extend relationship
• Two include relationship

(five marks)

• Two use case diagrams are
included, are of sufficient
detail, consistent with the
identified problems, require-
ments and the proposed
solution.

• All major actors are
included in the use case
diagram

For each use case diagram:
• Correct notation is used with

no more than one error
• 3 actors and 10 top level use

cases
• More than 2 extend

relationships
• More than 2 include

relationships

(six marks)

BISM7255 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYSIS & DESIGN — SEMESTER 1-2018

7

Activity
Diagrams
(x 1) – 4
points

• No activity
diagram
included

• Incorrect
notation is
used

(zero mark)

• Two activity diagrams
are included but they
do not include any
details, and are
inconsistent with the
identified problem,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

• Notation used for
activity diagrams has
many errors

For each activity diagram:
• Less than 10 activities
• No synchronization
• One decision activity

(one mark)

• Two activity diagrams
are included are of
sufficient detail,
consistent with the
identified problem,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

• Notation used for
activity diagrams has
some errors

For each activity diagram:
• Less than 10 activities
• No synchronization
• One decision activities

(two marks)

• Two activity diagrams are
included, are of sufficient
detail, consistent with the
identified problems,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

• Notation used for activity has
few errors

For each activity diagram:
• Exact 10 activities
• One synchronization (split

and join)
• Exact two decision activities

(three marks)

• Two activity diagrams are
included, are of sufficient
detail, consistent with the
identified problems,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

For each activity diagram:
• Correct notation is used with

no more than one error
• More than 10 activities
• Multiple synchronizations

(split and join)
• More than two decision

activities

(four marks)

BISM7255 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYSIS & DESIGN — SEMESTER 1-2018

8

Sequence
Diagrams

(x 1) – 4
points

• Simple
sequence
diagram
included

• Incorrect
notation is
used
(messages,
frames)

(zero mark)

• Two sequence
diagrams are included
but they do not include
any details, and are
inconsistent with the
identified problem,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

• Notation used for
sequence diagrams has
many errors

For each sequence diagram:
• Less than 3 domain

objects
• No messages notations

(one mark)

• Two sequence
diagrams are included
are of sufficient detail,
consistent with the
identified problem,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

• Notation used for
sequence diagrams has
some errors

For each sequence diagram:
• Less than 5 but at least

3 domain objects
• One opt frame and one

alt frame
• No messages notations

(two marks)

• Two sequence diagrams are
included are of sufficient
detail, consistent with the
identified problems,
requirements and the proposed
solution.

• Messages are in reasonable
logics

• Notation used for sequence
diagrams has few errors

For each sequence diagram:
• Exact 5 domain objects
• Two opt frames and two alt

frames
• One loop frame
• All messages notations (max

2 forgotten)

(three marks)

• Two sequence diagrams are
included, are of sufficient
detail, consistent with the
identified problems,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

• Messages are in reasonable
logics

For each sequence diagram:
• Correct notation is used with

no more than one error
• More than 5 domain objects
• More than two opt frames

and more than two alt
frames

• Two loop frames
• All messages notations

(four marks)

BISM7255 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYSIS & DESIGN — SEMESTER 1-2018

9

Domain
Class
Diagrams

(x 1.5) – 6
points

• Simple domain
class diagrams
are included

• Incorrect
notation is used
for domain
class diagrams

(zero mark)

• Two domain class
diagrams are included
but they do not
include any details,
and are inconsistent
with the identified
problem,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

• Notation used for
domain class
diagrams has many
errors

• Many error with
multiplicity

For each domain class
diagram:
• Less than 10 domain

classes
• No association class
• No instances of

generalization/
specialization

• No whole-part
relationships (i.e.,
aggregation,
composition)

(two marks)

• Two domain class
diagrams are included,
are of sufficient detail,
consistent with the
identified problem,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

• Notation used for
domain class diagrams
has some errors

• Some errors with
multiplicity

For each domain class
diagram:
• More than/ equal to 10

but less than 15 major
domain classes

• One association class
• Less than three

instances of
generalization/
specialization

• Less than three cases of
whole-part
relationships (i.e.,
aggregation,
composition)

(four marks)

• Two domain class
diagrams are included,
are of sufficient detail,
consistent with the
identified problem,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

• Notation used for domain
class diagrams has few
errors

• Few errors with
multiplicity

For each domain class
diagram:
• Exact 15 of the major

domain classes
• Two association class,

but not added all
association classes when
necessary

• Three instances of
generalization/
specialization

• Three cases of whole-
part relationships (i.e.,
aggregation,
composition)

(five marks)

• Two domain class diagrams are
included, are of sufficient
detail, consistent with the
identified problem,
requirements and the proposed
solution.

• Correct multiplicity

For each domain class diagram:
• More than 15 of the major

domain classes
• More than two association class

(can add association classes
when necessary)

• More than three instances of
generalization/ specialization

• More than three cases of
whole-part relationships (i.e.,
aggregation, composition)

• Correct notation is used for
domain class diagrams with no
more than one error

Note: Assignment requires that the
two domain class diagrams
represent the system from different
aspect points.

(six marks)

BISM7255 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYSIS & DESIGN — SEMESTER 1-2018

10

State
Machine
Diagrams

(x 1.5) – 6
points

• No state
machine
diagram
included

• Incorrect
notation is
used

(zero mark)

• Three state machine
diagrams are included
but they do not include
any details, and are
inconsistent with the
identified problem,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

• Notation used for state
machine has many errors

For each state machine
diagram:
• Less than three major

states
• No transition paths and

statements
• No concurrent paths
• No composite state

(two marks)

• Three state machine
diagrams are included
are of sufficient detail,
consistent with the
identified problem,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

• Notation used for state
machine diagrams has
some errors

For each state machine
diagram:
• Three to five major

states
• Includes few transition

paths and statements
• One concurrent paths
• One composite state

(four marks)

• Three state machine
diagrams are included
are of sufficient detail,
consistent with the
identified problem,
requirements and the
proposed solution.

• Notation used for state
machine diagrams has
few errors

For each state machine
diagram:
• Exact six major states
• Some transition paths

and statements
• Two concurrent paths
• Two composite states

(five marks)

• Three state machine diagrams are
included, are of sufficient detail,
consistent with the identified
problem, requirements and the
proposed solution.

• State switches with reasonable
logics

For each state machine diagram:
• Correct notation is used with no

more than one error
• More than six major states
• Multiple transition paths and

statements
• More than two concurrent paths
• More than two composite states

(six marks)

BISM7255 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYSIS & DESIGN — SEMESTER 1-2018

11

Poor Below Basic Proficient Advanced
Report
Layout

(x 1) – 5
points

Your report is not of high presentational quality, professional looking.
For example:
• Cover page is not included and pages are not numbered
• Overview page is not included and no table of contents
• Content is not split into logical sections and headings are not

meaningful
• Word number does not comply with requirements
• Words are not readable in the diagrams / too small fond size

(Zero, one, or two marks – depending on the number of issues listed)

Your report must be of high presentational quality, professional looking. For
example:

• Cover page is present and pages are numbered
• Overview page is included and there is a table of contents
• Content is split into logical sections and headings are meaningful
• The word limit it adherent to
• Words are readable in the diagrams / appropriate fond size

(Three, four or five marks – depending on the quality of the document)