” through a spyglass , i could see everything . ”
king louis xvi was beheaded on january 21 , 1793 , but instead of visualizing this act of regicide , legendary auteur eric rohmer’s the lady and the duke observes from afar .
consider it a view to a kill made abstract .
a proper british ( yes , british ) gentlewoman , grace elliott ( lucy russell ) , and her loyal maidservant gaze from a lofty terrace in meudon at the glistening city of paris , where raucous crowds seem tinier than ants .
the maid narrates what little she sees of the execution through her telescope ( often muttering , ” i don’t know , ” ) as the sound of cheering patriots and revolutionaries echoes through the air .
what we don’t see might not be able to hurt us .
just close your eyes and think of england .
during times of revolution , the aristocracy may feel a false sense of calm in their parlor halls , discussing tumultuous events over glasses of sherry until the walls cave in on them .
adapted from elliott’s memoirs , journal of my life during the french revolution , rohmer’s latest artistic tour-de-force may seem far removed from his domestic comedies ( tales of the four seasons , etc . ) , a period film set during the most violent changes in french history .
resisting the temptation for grand-scale theatrics , much of the lady and the duke is about quiet , decisive moments between members of the cultural elite as they determine how to proceed as the world implodes .
grace elliott makes for an unlikely protagonist : a headstrong , snobbish blueblood , one unprepared for the machinations of history that sweep her along .
a foreigner who accepts the french king as her own , grace’s life seems defined by fancy attire and lively political debate with her former lover , the king’s hot-blooded cousin , prince philipe , duke of orleans ( jean-claude dreyfus ) .
the times are changing , though , and the gears inch ever closer toward violence .
during the september massacres of 1792 , she is encountered by a procession of rioters brandishing the head of the duke’s sister-in-law on a stake .
rohmer makes a harsh transition from tranquil , old fashioned , almost stagy parlor scenes to the swell of an angry mob .
in doing so , he achieves what braveheart and the patriot could not : the face of death .
when grace sees her friend’s disembodied head on a pole , rohmer’s attention drifts from the societal change to one woman’s reaction shot , laden with hot tears .
grace finds herself taking in a fugitive from justice , sheltering him from the mob .
through her relationship with the duke , she seeks a passport for this one activist’s escape .
grace doesn’t even understand her own actions ( and the duke reacts in stunned disbelief at how she places herself in such danger ) .
she endures persecution from robespierre and his gang of thuggish equalizers , ceaseless police monitoring , house searches , even a brief imprisonment for harmless international correspondence .
maintaining her stiff upper lip and pampered life ( her imperious attitude to the servants never changes ) , she becomes a heroine through circumstance .
the events themselves are intrusions upon her person , her home , and therefore her values .
aristocracy proves a glass house , one that can barely withstand the upheaval of stones .
the duke is called to vote on the king’s punishment , and despite his hours of deliberation with friends and advisors , talk means nothing in the face of bloody action ( or futile inaction ) .
the episodic structure creates a wobbly , jarring detachment from the events of the french revolution , which serves as metaphor but also disconnects potential audience identification .
lazy viewers ( and critics ) may also complain that knowledge of french history is required for enjoyment of the lady and the duke .
that’s foolery , but brings up the valid criticism that rohmer’s characters occasionally become didactic .
rohmer’s imperfect but assured push toward the future remains staunch and notable for casting a cautious eye upon the past while taking bold steps forward into an uncertain future .
what may arouse interest in the lady and the duke outside of foreign film enthusiasts with literary and historical passions is rohmer’s use of cutting edge digital technology as a means of exploring the theme of artifice as safety net or coping mechanism .
the actors were filmed against a bluescreen , then placed against painted backdrops recreating the vastness of 18th century paris .
this recreation calls attention to itself in every shot , a technicolor dream of fanciful buildings and wide-open streets .
it looks as phony as titanic , but unlike james cameron’s debacle , the lady and the duke plays with the notion of false security in those walls of stone .
why ?
they aren’t real .
the very foundation rohmer’s characters stand upon is false , and in their groundlessness they must discover themselves , in all their insubstantial glory .
screened at the 2001 new york film festival ( feature coming soon ) .