CS计算机代考程序代写 SQL Functional Dependencies data structure information retrieval database Hive 2021/8/8 Database normalization – Wikipedia

2021/8/8 Database normalization – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization 1/9

An update anomaly. Employee 519 is shown

as having different addresses on different

records.

Database normalization

Database normalization is the process of structuring a database, usually a relational database, in accordance with a series of so-called normal
forms in order to reduce data redundancy and improve data integrity. It was first proposed by Edgar F. Codd as part of his relational model.

Normalization entails organizing the columns (attributes) and tables (relations) of a database to ensure that their dependencies are properly enforced
by database integrity constraints. It is accomplished by applying some formal rules either by a process of synthesis (creating a new database design) or
decomposition (improving an existing database design).

Objectives

Minimize redesign when extending the database structure

Normal forms

Example of a step by step normalization

Initial data

Satisfying 1NF

Satisfying 2NF

Satisfying 3NF

Satisfying EKNF

Satisfying 4NF

Satisfying ETNF

Satisfying 5NF

Satisfying DKNF

Satisfying 6NF

See also

Notes and references

Further reading

External links

A basic objective of the first normal form defined by Codd in 1970 was to permit data to be queried and manipulated using a “universal data sub-
language” grounded in first-order logic.[1] (SQL is an example of such a data sub-language, albeit one that Codd regarded as seriously flawed.[2])

The objectives of normalisation beyond 1NF (first normal form) were stated as follows by Codd:

1. To free the collection of relations from undesirable insertion, update and deletion dependencies.

2. To reduce the need for restructuring the collection of relations, as new types of data are introduced, and thus increase the life

span of application programs.

3. To make the relational model more informative to users.

4. To make the collection of relations neutral to the query statistics, where these statistics are liable to change as time goes by.

— E.F. Codd, “Further Normalisation of the Data Base Relational Model”[3]

When an attempt is made to modify (update, insert into, or delete from) a relation, the following
undesirable side-effects may arise in relations that have not been sufficiently normalized:

Update anomaly. The same information can be expressed on multiple rows; therefore updates to

the relation may result in logical inconsistencies. For example, each record in an “Employees’

Skills” relation might contain an Employee ID, Employee Address, and Skill; thus a change of

address for a particular employee may need to be applied to multiple records (one for each

skill). If the update is only partially successful – the employee’s address is updated on some

records but not others – then the relation is left in an inconsistent state. Specifically, the

relation provides conflicting answers to the question of what this particular employee’s address

is. This phenomenon is known as an update anomaly.

Contents

Objectives

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Update_anomaly.svg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relational_database
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_redundancy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_integrity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_F._Codd
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relational_model
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Column_(database)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relation_(database)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_theory_(database_theory)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL

2021/8/8 Database normalization – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization 2/9

An insertion anomaly. Until the new faculty

member, Dr. Newsome, is assigned to teach

at least one course, his or her details

cannot be recorded.

A deletion anomaly. All information about

Dr. Giddens is lost if he or she temporarily

ceases to be assigned to any courses.

Insertion anomaly. There are circumstances in which certain facts cannot be recorded at all. For

example, each record in a “Faculty and Their Courses” relation might contain a Faculty ID,

Faculty Name, Faculty Hire Date, and Course Code. Therefore, the details of any faculty member

who teaches at least one course can be recorded, but a newly hired faculty member who has not

yet been assigned to teach any courses cannot be recorded, except by setting the Course Code

to null. This phenomenon is known as an insertion anomaly.

Deletion anomaly. Under certain circumstances, deletion of data representing certain facts

necessitates deletion of data representing completely different facts. The “Faculty and Their

Courses” relation described in the previous example suffers from this type of anomaly, for if a

faculty member temporarily ceases to be assigned to any courses, the last of the records on

which that faculty member appears must be deleted, effectively also deleting the faculty

member, unless the Course Code field is set to null. This phenomenon is known as a deletion

anomaly.

A fully normalized database allows its structure to be extended to accommodate new types of data without
changing existing structure too much. As a result, applications interacting with the database are
minimally affected.

Normalized relations, and the relationship between one normalized relation and another, mirror real-
world concepts and their interrelationships.

Codd introduced the concept of normalization and what is now known as the first normal form (1NF) in 1970.[4] Codd went on to define the second
normal form (2NF) and third normal form (3NF) in 1971,[5] and Codd and Raymond F. Boyce defined the Boyce–Codd normal form (BCNF) in 1974.[6]

Informally, a relational database relation is often described as “normalized” if it meets third normal form.[7] Most 3NF relations are free of insertion,
updation, and deletion anomalies.

The normal forms (from least normalized to most normalized) are:

UNF

(1970)

1NF

(1970)

2NF

(1971)

3NF

(1971)

EKNF

(1982)

BCNF

(1974)

4NF

(1977)

ETNF

(2012)

5NF

(1979)

DKNF

(1981)

6NF

(2003)

Primary key (no duplicate tuples)[4]

Atomic columns (cells cannot have tables as values)[5]

Every non-trivial functional dependency either does not begin with a proper

subset of a candidate key or ends with a prime attribute (no partial

functional dependencies of non-prime attributes on candidate keys)[5]

Every non-trivial functional dependency either begins with a superkey or

ends with a prime attribute (no transitive functional dependencies of non-

prime attributes on candidate keys)[5]

Every non-trivial functional dependency either begins with a superkey or

ends with an elementary prime attribute
N/A

Every non-trivial functional dependency begins with a superkey N/A

Every non-trivial multivalued dependency begins with a superkey N/A

Every join dependency has a superkey component[8] N/A

Every join dependency has only superkey components N/A

Every constraint is a consequence of domain constraints and key

constraints

Every join dependency is trivial

UNF: Unnormalized form

1NF: First normal form

2NF: Second normal form

3NF: Third normal form

EKNF: Elementary key normal form

BCNF: Boyce–Codd normal form

4NF: Fourth normal form

ETNF: Essential tuple normal form

5NF: Fifth normal form

DKNF: Domain-key normal form

6NF: Sixth normal form

Minimize redesign when extending the database structure

Normal forms

Example of a step by step normalization

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Insertion_anomaly.svg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Deletion_anomaly.svg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_(SQL)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_F._Boyce
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boyce%E2%80%93Codd_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unnormalized_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_key_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boyce%E2%80%93Codd_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Essential_tuple_normal_form&action=edit&redlink=1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-key_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_key
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuple
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_dependency
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candidate_key
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candidate_key
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superkey
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitive_dependency
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_key_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivalued_dependency
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Join_dependency
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unnormalized_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_key_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boyce%E2%80%93Codd_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Essential_tuple_normal_form&action=edit&redlink=1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-key_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_normal_form

2021/8/8 Database normalization – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization 3/9

Normalization is a database design technique, which is used to design a relational database table up to higher normal form.[9] The process is
progressive, and a higher level of database normalization cannot be achieved unless the previous levels have been satisfied.[10]

That means that, having data in unnormalized form (the least normalized) and aiming to achieve the highest level of normalization, the first step
would be to ensure compliance to first normal form, the second step would be to ensure second normal form is satisfied, and so forth in order
mentioned above, until the data conform to sixth normal form.

However, it is worth noting that normal forms beyond 4NF are mainly of academic interest, as the problems they exist to solve rarely appear in
practice.[11]

Please note that the data in the following example were intentionally designed to contradict most of the normal forms. In real life, it’s quite possible
to be able to skip some of the normalization steps because the table doesn’t contain anything contradicting the given normal form. It also commonly
occurs that fixing a violation of one normal form also fixes a violation of a higher normal form in the process. Also one table has been chosen for
normalization at each step, meaning that at the end of this example process, there might still be some tables not satisfying the highest normal form.

Let a database table exist with the following structure:[10]

Title Author
Author

Nationality
Format Price Subject Pages Thickness Publisher

Publisher

Country

Publication

Type

Genre

ID

Genre

Name

Beginning MySQL

Database Design and

Optimization

Chad

Russell
American Hardcover 49.99

MySQL

Database

Design

520 Thick Apress USA E-book 1 Tutorial

For this example, it is assumed that each book has only one author.

As a prerequisite to conform to the relational model, a table must have a primary key, which uniquely identifies a row. Two books could have the same
title, but an ISBN number uniquely identifies a book, so it can be used as the primary key:

ISBN# Title Author
Author

Nationality
Format Price Subject Pages Thickness Publisher

Publisher

Country

Publication

Type

Genre

ID

Genre

Name

1590593324

Beginning

MySQL

Database

Design and

Optimization

Chad

Russell
American Hardcover 49.99

MySQL

Database

Design

520 Thick Apress USA E-book 1 Tutorial

To satisfy First normal form, each column of a table must have a single value. Columns which contain sets of values or nested records are not allowed.

In the initial table, Subject contains a set of subject values, meaning it does not comply.

To solve the problem, the subjects are extracted into a separate Subject table:[10]

Book

ISBN# Title Format Author
Author

Nationality
Price Pages Thickness Publisher

Publisher

country

Genre

ID

Genre

Name

1590593324
Beginning MySQL Database Design

and Optimization
Hardcover

Chad

Russell
American 49.99 520 Thick Apress USA 1 Tutorial

Subject

ISBN# Subject name

1590593324 MySQL

1590593324 Database

1590593324 Design

A foreign key column to the Subject-table is added, which refers to the primary key of the row from which the subject was extracted. The same
information is therefore represented but without the use of non-simple domains.

Instead of one table in unnormalized form, there are now two tables conforming to the 1NF.

Initial data

Satisfying 1NF

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relational_database
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unnormalized_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4NF
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_key
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unnormalized_form

2021/8/8 Database normalization – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization 4/9

The Book table has one candidate key (which is therefore the primary key), the composite key {Title, Format}.[12] Consider the following table
fragment:

Book

Title Format Author
Author

Nationality
Price Pages Thickness

Genre

ID
Genre Name

Publisher

ID

Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization Hardcover
Chad

Russell
American 49.99 520 Thick 1 Tutorial 1

Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization E-book
Chad

Russell
American 22.34 520 Thick 1 Tutorial 1

The Relational Model for Database Management:

Version 2
E-book E.F.Codd British 13.88 538 Thick 2

Popular

science
2

The Relational Model for Database Management:

Version 2
Paperback E.F.Codd British 39.99 538 Thick 2

Popular

science
2

All of the attributes that are not part of the candidate key depend on Title, but only Price also depends on Format. To conform to 2NF and remove
duplicities, every non candidate-key attribute must depend on the whole candidate key, not just part of it.

To normalize this table, make {Title} a (simple) candidate key (the primary key) so that every non candidate-key attribute depends on the whole
candidate key, and remove Price into a separate table so that its dependency on Format can be preserved:

Book

Title Author
Author

Nationality
Pages Thickness

Genre

ID

Genre

Name

Publisher

ID

Beginning MySQL Database

Design and Optimization

Chad

Russell
American 520 Thick 1 Tutorial 1

The Relational Model for

Database Management:

Version 2

E.F.Codd British 538 Thick 2
Popular

science
2

Format – Price

Title Format Price

Beginning MySQL Database

Design and Optimization
Hardcover 49.99

Beginning MySQL Database

Design and Optimization
E-book 22.34

The Relational Model for

Database Management: Version

2

E-book 13.88

The Relational Model for

Database Management: Version

2

Paperback 39.99

Now, the Book table conforms to 2NF.

The Book table still has a transitive functional dependency ({Author Nationality} is dependent on {Author}, which is dependent on {Title}). A similar
violation exists for genre ({Genre Name} is dependent on {Genre ID}, which is dependent on {Title}). Hence, the Book table is not in 3NF. To make it
in 3NF, let’s use the following table structure, thereby eliminating the transitive functional dependencies by placing {Author Nationality} and {Genre
Name} in their own respective tables:

Book

Title Author Pages Thickness Genre ID Publisher ID

Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization Chad Russell 520 Thick 1 1

The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 E.F.Codd 538 Thick 2 2

Format – Price

Title Format Price

Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization Hardcover 49.99

Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization E-book 22.34

The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 E-book 13.88

The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 Paperback 39.99

Satisfying 2NF

Satisfying 3NF

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candidate_key
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_key
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composite_key
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_normal_form

2021/8/8 Database normalization – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization 5/9

Author

Author Author Nationality

Chad Russell American

E.F.Codd British

Genre

Genre ID Genre Name

1 Tutorial

2 Popular science

The elementary key normal form (EKNF) falls strictly between 3NF and BCNF and is not much discussed in the literature. It is intended “to capture
the salient qualities of both 3NF and BCNF” while avoiding the problems of both (namely, that 3NF is “too forgiving” and BCNF is “prone to
computational complexity”). Since it is rarely mentioned in literature, it is not included in this example.[13]

Assume the database is owned by a book retailer franchise that has several franchisees that own shops in different locations. And therefore the retailer
decided to add a table that contains data about availability of the books at different locations:

Franchisee – Book Location

Franchisee ID Title Location

1 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization California

1 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization Florida

1 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization Texas

1 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 California

1 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 Florida

1 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 Texas

2 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization California

2 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization Florida

2 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization Texas

2 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 California

2 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 Florida

2 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 Texas

3 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization Texas

As this table structure consists of a compound primary key, it doesn’t contain any non-key attributes and it’s already in BCNF (and therefore also
satisfies all the previous normal forms). However, assuming that all available books are offered in each area, the Title is not unambiguously bound to
a certain Location and therefore the table doesn’t satisfy 4NF.

That means that, to satisfy the fourth normal form, this table needs to be decomposed as well:

Franchisee – Book

Franchisee ID Title

1 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization

1 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2

2 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization

2 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2

3 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization

Franchisee – Location

Franchisee ID Location

1 California

1 Florida

1 Texas

2 California

2 Florida

2 Texas

3 Texas

Satisfying EKNF

Satisfying 4NF

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compound_key
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boyce%E2%80%93Codd_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_normal_form

2021/8/8 Database normalization – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization 6/9

Now, every record is unambiguously identified by a superkey, therefore 4NF is satisfied.[14]

Suppose the franchisees can also order books from different suppliers. Let the relation also be subject to the following constraint:

If a certain supplier supplies a certain title

and the title is supplied to the franchisee

and the franchisee is being supplied by the supplier,

then the supplier supplies the title to the franchisee.[15]

Supplier – Book – Franchisee

Supplier ID Title Franchisee ID

1 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization 1

2 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 2

3 Learning SQL 3

This table is in 4NF, but the Supplier ID is equal to the join of its projections: {{Supplier ID, Book}, {Book, Franchisee ID}, {Franchisee ID,
Supplier ID}}. No component of that join dependency is a superkey (the sole superkey being the entire heading), so the table does not satisfy the
ETNF and can be further decomposed:[15]

Supplier – Book

Supplier

ID
Title

1 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization

2
The Relational Model for Database Management:

Version 2

3 Learning SQL

Book – Franchisee

Title
Franchisee

ID

Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization 1

The Relational Model for Database Management:

Version 2
2

Learning SQL 3

Franchisee – Supplier

Supplier

ID

Franchisee

ID

1 1

2 2

3 3

The decomposition produces ETNF compliance.

To spot a table not satisfying the 5NF, it is usually necessary to examine the data thoroughly. Suppose the table from 4NF example with a little
modification in data and let’s examine if it satisfies 5NF:

Franchisee – Book Location

Franchisee ID Title Location

1 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization California

1 Learning SQL California

1 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 Texas

2 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 California

Decomposing this table lowers redundancies, resulting in the following two tables:

Franchisee – Book

Franchisee ID Title

1 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization

1 Learning SQL

1 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2

2 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2

Franchisee – Location

Franchisee ID Location

1 California

1 Texas

2 California

The query joining these tables would return the following data:

Satisfying ETNF

Satisfying 5NF

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superkey
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4NF
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superkey
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Essential_tuple_normal_form&action=edit&redlink=1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_normal_form

2021/8/8 Database normalization – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization 7/9

Franchisee – Book – Location JOINed

Franchisee ID Title Location

1 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization California

1 Learning SQL California

1 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 California

1 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 Texas

1 Learning SQL Texas

1 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization Texas

2 The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 California

The JOIN returns three more rows than it should; adding another table to clarify the relation results in three separate tables:

Franchisee – Book

Franchisee

ID
Title

1 Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization

1 Learning SQL

1
The Relational Model for Database Management:

Version 2

2
The Relational Model for Database Management:

Version 2

Franchisee – Location

Franchisee

ID
Location

1 California

1 Texas

2 California

Location – Book

Location Title

California Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization

California Learning SQL

California
The Relational Model for Database Management:

Version 2

Texas
The Relational Model for Database Management:

Version 2

What will the JOIN return now? It actually is not possible to join these three tables. That means it wasn’t possible to decompose the Franchisee –
Book Location without data loss, therefore the table already satisfies 5NF.[14]

C.J. Date has argued that only a database in 5NF is truly “normalized”.[16]

Let’s have a look at the Book table from previous examples and see if it satisfies the Domain-key normal form:

Book

Title Pages Thickness Genre ID Publisher ID

Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization 520 Thick 1 1

The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 538 Thick 2 2

Learning SQL 338 Slim 1 3

SQL Cookbook 636 Thick 1 3

Logically, Thickness is determined by number of pages. That means it depends on Pages which is not a key. Let’s set an example convention saying a
book up to 350 pages is considered “slim” and a book over 350 pages is considered “thick”.

This convention is technically a constraint but it is neither a domain constraint nor a key constraint; therefore we cannot rely on domain constraints
and key constraints to keep the data integrity.

In other words — nothing prevents us from putting, for example, “Thick” for a book with only 50 pages — and this makes the table violate DKNF.

To solve this, a table holding enumeration that defines the Thickness is created, and that column is removed from the original table:

Thickness Enum

Thickness Min pages Max pages

Slim 1 350

Thick 351 999,999,999,999

Book – Pages – Genre – Publisher

Title Pages Genre ID Publisher ID

Beginning MySQL Database Design and Optimization 520 1 1

The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 538 2 2

Learning SQL 338 1 3

SQL Cookbook 636 1 3

Satisfying DKNF

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5NF
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-key_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-key_normal_form

2021/8/8 Database normalization – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization 8/9

That way, the domain integrity violation has been eliminated, and the table is in DKNF.

A simple and intuitive definition of the sixth normal form is that “a table is in 6NF when the row contains the Primary Key, and at most one
other attribute”.[17]

That means, for example, the Publisher table designed while creating the 1NF

Publisher

Publisher_ID Name Country

1 Apress USA

needs to be further decomposed into two tables:

Publisher

Publisher_ID Name

1 Apress

Publisher country

Publisher_ID Country

1 USA

The obvious drawback of 6NF is the proliferation of tables required to represent the information on a single entity. If a table in 5NF has one primary
key column and N attributes, representing the same information in 6NF will require N tables; multi-field updates to a single conceptual record will
require updates to multiple tables; and inserts and deletes will similarly require operations across multiple tables. For this reason, in databases
intended to serve Online Transaction Processing needs, 6NF should not be used.

However, in data warehouses, which do not permit interactive updates and which are specialized for fast query on large data volumes, certain DBMSs
use an internal 6NF representation — known as a columnar data store. In situations where the number of unique values of a column is far less than the
number of rows in the table, column-oriented storage allow significant savings in space through data compression. Columnar storage also allows fast
execution of range queries (e.g., show all records where a particular column is between X and Y, or less than X.)

In all these cases, however, the database designer does not have to perform 6NF normalization manually by creating separate tables. Some DBMSs
that are specialized for warehousing, such as Sybase IQ, use columnar storage by default, but the designer still sees only a single multi-column table.
Other DBMSs, such as Microsoft SQL Server 2012 and later, let you specify a “columnstore index” for a particular table.[18]

Denormalization

Database refactoring

Lossless join decomposition

1. “The adoption of a relational model of data … permits the
development of a universal data sub-language based on an
applied predicate calculus. A first-order predicate calculus
suffices if the collection of relations is in first normal form. Such a
language would provide a yardstick of linguistic power for all other
proposed data languages, and would itself be a strong candidate
for embedding (with appropriate syntactic modification) in a
variety of host languages (programming, command- or problem-
oriented).” Codd, “A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared
Data Banks” (http://www.acm.org/classics/nov95/toc.html)
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20070612235326/http://w
ww.acm.org/classics/nov95/toc.html) June 12, 2007, at the
Wayback Machine, p. 381

2. Codd, E.F. Chapter 23, “Serious Flaws in SQL”, in The Relational
Model for Database Management: Version 2. Addison-Wesley
(1990), pp. 371–389

3. Codd, E.F. “Further Normalisation of the Data Base Relational
Model”, p. 34

4. Codd, E. F. (June 1970). “A Relational Model of Data for Large
Shared Data Banks” (https://web.archive.org/web/200706122353
26/http://www.acm.org/classics/nov95/toc.html).
Communications of the ACM. 13 (6): 377–387.
doi:10.1145/362384.362685 (https://doi.org/10.1145%2F362384.3
62685). S2CID 207549016 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/Corpu
sID:207549016). Archived from the original (http://www.acm.org/c
lassics/nov95/toc.html) on June 12, 2007. Retrieved August 25,
2005.

5. Codd, E. F. “Further Normalization of the Data Base Relational
Model”. (Presented at Courant Computer Science Symposia Series
6, “Data Base Systems”, New York City, May 24–25, 1971.) IBM
Research Report RJ909 (August 31, 1971). Republished in Randall
J. Rustin (ed.), Data Base Systems: Courant Computer Science
Symposia Series 6. Prentice-Hall, 1972.

6. Codd, E. F. “Recent Investigations into Relational Data Base
Systems”. IBM Research Report RJ1385 (April 23, 1974).
Republished in Proc. 1974 Congress (Stockholm, Sweden, 1974),
N.Y.: North-Holland (1974).

7. Date, C. J. (1999). An Introduction to Database Systems. Addison-
Wesley. p. 290.

Satisfying 6NF

See also

Notes and references

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-key_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_normal_form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLTP
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_warehouses
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Column-oriented_DBMS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybase_IQ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denormalization
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_refactoring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossless_join_decomposition
http://www.acm.org/classics/nov95/toc.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20070612235326/http://www.acm.org/classics/nov95/toc.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayback_Machine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_F._Codd
https://web.archive.org/web/20070612235326/http://www.acm.org/classics/nov95/toc.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_of_the_ACM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doi_(identifier)
https://doi.org/10.1145%2F362384.362685
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)
https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:207549016
http://www.acm.org/classics/nov95/toc.html

2021/8/8 Database normalization – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization 9/9

Date, C. J. (1999), An Introduction to Database Systems (https://web.archive.org/web/20050404010227/http://www.aw-bc.com/catalog/

academic/product/0%2C1144%2C0321197844%2C00.html) (8th ed.). Addison-Wesley Longman. ISBN 0-321-19784-4.

Kent, W. (1983) A Simple Guide to Five Normal Forms in Relational Database Theory (http://www.bkent.net/Doc/simple5.htm),

Communications of the ACM, vol. 26, pp. 120–125

H.-J. Schek, P. Pistor Data Structures for an Integrated Data Base Management and Information Retrieval System

Kent, William (February 1983). “A Simple Guide to Five Normal Forms in Relational Database Theory” (http://www.bkent.net/Doc/simple5.h

tm). Communications of the ACM. 26 (2): 120–125. doi:10.1145/358024.358054 (https://doi.org/10.1145%2F358024.358054).

S2CID 9195704 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:9195704).

Database Normalization Basics (http://databases.about.com/od/specificproducts/a/normalization.htm) by Mike Chapple (About.com)

Database Normalization Intro (http://www.databasejournal.com/sqletc/article.php/1428511), Part 2 (http://www.databasejournal.com/sqlet

c/article.php/26861_1474411_1)

An Introduction to Database Normalization (http://mikehillyer.com/articles/an-introduction-to-database-normalization/) by Mike Hillyer.

A tutorial on the first 3 normal forms (http://phlonx.com/resources/nf3/) by Fred Coulson

Description of the database normalization basics (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/283878) by Microsoft

Normalization in DBMS by Chaitanya (beginnersbook.com) (http://beginnersbook.com/2015/05/normalization-in-dbms/)

A Step-by-Step Guide to Database Normalization (https://www.databasestar.com/normalization-in-dbms/)

ETNF – Essential tuple normal form (http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/files/us-fagin/icdt12.pdf)

Retrieved from “https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Database_normalization&oldid=1032512879”

This page was last edited on 7 July 2021, at 21:56 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy

Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

8. Darwen, Hugh; Date, C. J.; Fagin, Ronald (2012). “A Normal Form
for Preventing Redundant Tuples in Relational Databases” (http
s://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/files/us-fagin/icdt12.p
df) (PDF). Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on
Database Theory. EDBT/ICDT 2012 Joint Conference (http://edbti
cdt2012.dima.tu-berlin.de/). ACM International Conference
Proceeding Series. Association for Computing Machinery. p. 114.
doi:10.1145/2274576.2274589 (https://doi.org/10.1145%2F227457
6.2274589). ISBN 978-1-4503-0791-8. OCLC 802369023 (http
s://www.worldcat.org/oclc/802369023). Retrieved May 22, 2018.

9. Kumar, Kunal; Azad, S. K. (October 2017). Database normalization
design pattern. 2017 4th IEEE Uttar Pradesh Section International
Conference on Electrical, Computer and Electronics (UPCON).
IEEE. doi:10.1109/upcon.2017.8251067 (https://doi.org/10.1109%2F
upcon.2017.8251067). ISBN 9781538630044. S2CID 24491594 (htt
ps://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:24491594).

10. “Database normalization in MySQL: Four quick and easy steps” (ht
tps://web.archive.org/web/20170830224213/https://www.comput
erweekly.com/tutorial/Database-normalization-in-MySQL-Four-q
uick-and-easy-steps). ComputerWeekly.com. Archived from the
original (https://www.computerweekly.com/tutorial/Database-nor
malization-in-MySQL-Four-quick-and-easy-steps) on August
30, 2017. Retrieved March 23, 2021.

11. “Database Normalization: 5th Normal Form and Beyond” (https://
mariadb.com/kb/en/library/database-normalization-5th-normal-f
orm-and-beyond/). MariaDB KnowledgeBase. Retrieved
January 23, 2019.

12. The table fragment itself has several candidate keys (simple key
{Price}, and compound keys of Format together with any column
except Price or Thickness), but we assume that in the complete
table only {Title, Format} will be unique.

13. “Additional Normal Forms – Database Design and Relational
Theory – page 151” (http://what-when-how.com/Tutorial/topic-11
14galv/Database-Design-and-Relational-Theory-167.html). what-
when-how.com. Retrieved January 22, 2019.

14. “Normalizace databáze” (https://cs.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?titl
e=Normalizace_datab%C3%A1ze&oldid=16615346), Wikipedie (in
Czech), November 7, 2018, retrieved January 22, 2019

15. Date, C. J. (December 21, 2015). The New Relational Database
Dictionary: Terms, Concepts, and Examples (https://books.google.
com/books?id=Jx5UCwAAQBAJ&q=etnf%20normalization&pg=PT
138). “O’Reilly Media, Inc.”. p. 138. ISBN 9781491951699.

16. Date, C. J. (December 21, 2015). The New Relational Database
Dictionary: Terms, Concepts, and Examples (https://books.google.
com/books?id=Jx5UCwAAQBAJ&q=etnf%20normalization&pg=PT
163). “O’Reilly Media, Inc.”. p. 163. ISBN 9781491951699.

17. “normalization – Would like to Understand 6NF with an Example”
(https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4824714/would-like-to-un
derstand-6nf-with-an-example). Stack Overflow. Retrieved
January 23, 2019.

18. Microsoft Corporation. Columnstore Indexes: Overview.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-
databases/indexes/columnstore-indexes-overview . Accessed
Mar 23, 2020.

Further reading

External links

https://web.archive.org/web/20050404010227/http://www.aw-bc.com/catalog/academic/product/0%2C1144%2C0321197844%2C00.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-321-19784-4
http://www.bkent.net/Doc/simple5.htm
http://www.bkent.net/Doc/simple5.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doi_(identifier)
https://doi.org/10.1145%2F358024.358054
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)
https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:9195704
http://databases.about.com/od/specificproducts/a/normalization.htm
http://www.databasejournal.com/sqletc/article.php/1428511
http://www.databasejournal.com/sqletc/article.php/26861_1474411_1

An Introduction to Database Normalization


http://phlonx.com/resources/nf3/
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/283878
http://beginnersbook.com/2015/05/normalization-in-dbms/
https://www.databasestar.com/normalization-in-dbms/
http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/files/us-fagin/icdt12.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Database_normalization&oldid=1032512879
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License
https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use
https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Privacy_policy

Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge.


https://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/files/us-fagin/icdt12.pdf
http://edbticdt2012.dima.tu-berlin.de/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_for_Computing_Machinery
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doi_(identifier)
https://doi.org/10.1145%2F2274576.2274589
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-1-4503-0791-8
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OCLC_(identifier)
https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/802369023
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doi_(identifier)
https://doi.org/10.1109%2Fupcon.2017.8251067
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9781538630044
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)
https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:24491594
https://web.archive.org/web/20170830224213/https://www.computerweekly.com/tutorial/Database-normalization-in-MySQL-Four-quick-and-easy-steps
https://www.computerweekly.com/tutorial/Database-normalization-in-MySQL-Four-quick-and-easy-steps
https://mariadb.com/kb/en/library/database-normalization-5th-normal-form-and-beyond/
http://what-when-how.com/Tutorial/topic-1114galv/Database-Design-and-Relational-Theory-167.html
https://cs.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Normalizace_datab%C3%A1ze&oldid=16615346
https://books.google.com/books?id=Jx5UCwAAQBAJ&q=etnf%20normalization&pg=PT138
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9781491951699
https://books.google.com/books?id=Jx5UCwAAQBAJ&q=etnf%20normalization&pg=PT163
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9781491951699
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4824714/would-like-to-understand-6nf-with-an-example
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/indexes/columnstore-indexes-overview